Friends of Endoscopy
  • Home
  • Quiz Cases
  • Endoscopy Long Cases
  • Short Teaching Clips
  • Blackboard teaching
  • Podcasts
  • Core Reading
    • Basic concepts core reading
    • Gastroscopy core reading
    • Colonoscopy core reading
    • QA core reading
  • About
    • Our sponsors
  • Home
  • Quiz Cases
  • Endoscopy Long Cases
  • Short Teaching Clips
  • Blackboard teaching
  • Podcasts
  • Core Reading
    • Basic concepts core reading
    • Gastroscopy core reading
    • Colonoscopy core reading
    • QA core reading
  • About
    • Our sponsors
Search
Picture
​

Friends of Endoscopy is all about pattern recognition.  See it today and recognise it tomorrow!   Learn from a New Case on most weekdays !!! 
Become a Better Endoscopist ! 

An unusual Barrett's?

16/2/2021

 
Picture
This is a C2M4 Barrett's under surveillance
WHAT IS THE LIKELY HISTOLOGY?
■ Non-neoplastic Barrett's
Nodularity within Barrett's is always bad!
■ LGD
Visible nodularity is never truly just LGD
■ HGD/IMca
A good guess but you are missing something!
■ Invasive cancer
Yes! That small ulcer is the spot of invasive cancer!
explanation
Of course you should initially scrutinise the right-hand part of the Barrett's between 12 and 5 O'clock or so. Furthermore, dysplasia is most common in the distal rather than proximal Barrett's. However, in this case the subtle nodularity is situated in the 11 O'clock position. That is why I call this an 'unusual case' of Barrett's

I don't think that LGD is visible endoscopically or possible to recognise even by AI systems.  However, in this case there is a definite nodularity and HGD/IMca seems the most likely diagnosis.   However, worryingly there is a small depression in the centre of the lesion (seen best on NBI) without any crypt pattern at all.  That is the location of the poor differentiation and invasion below the muscular mucosa.  Furthermore, biopsies revealed LVI and the patient subsequently had chemoradiotherapy (CRT). CRT is a great option in elderly patients but I do worry when young patients opt for CRT. This is because they are at high risk of developing further lesions and they have decades of life expectancy ahead of them for this to happen.  The ultimate staging was T1b, N0 disease. I've attached a reminder about TNM staging because it's easy to forget it unless you see it every day! 
Picture
​One final point, why did I lump HGD and IMca together?  Simply because histologically, it's very difficult and perhaps impossible to distinguish the two.  Furthermore, there is no need to distinguish the two entities. Both are treated endoscopically!  

This used to be one of the sticks that surgeons beat me with when I started to propose endoscopic resection for small nodules which biopsies had reported HGD.  They would say rubbish like: "I remember doing an oesophagectomy for a patient with dysplasia and afterwards the histopathologists REPORTED CAAAAANCEEER !!!!" 

Thank God, those guys have retired! 

    Categories

    All
    Barrett's
    Cancer
    Cancer Syndromes
    Colitis
    Colorectum
    Corrosive Ingestion
    Crypt Pattern
    Difficulty: Hard
    Difficulty: Moderate
    Difficulty: Very Hard
    Duodenum
    Eosinophilic Oesophagitis
    EUS
    Foveolar Metaplasia
    Gastric
    Gastroscopy
    GI Bleeding
    Histology
    HPB
    Ileum
    Immunosuppression
    Infection
    Local Recurrence Of Barrett's Ca.
    Lymphoma
    Mixed Polyp
    Mucosal Prolapse Syndrome
    NET
    Non-lifting Sign
    Oesophagus
    Opinion Piece!
    Pharynx
    Polyp
    Polypectomy
    The Basics
    TSA

  • Home
  • Quiz Cases
  • Endoscopy Long Cases
  • Short Teaching Clips
  • Blackboard teaching
  • Podcasts
  • Core Reading
    • Basic concepts core reading
    • Gastroscopy core reading
    • Colonoscopy core reading
    • QA core reading
  • About
    • Our sponsors